This statement have absolutely nothing feel unless of course this isn’t told me exactly what is actually understood because “integration”

8. Para. 33 [See new section 56]: “It has to be recognised that part of the Russian-speaking community in Latvia resists integration”. Many researchers concluded that the main problem is that the very concept of integration is interpreted in different ways by the government and the Russian-speaking community: while the official policies stress acquisition of the Latvian language, and acceptance of the “official” version of history, citizenship legislation and language policies as the main criteria for integration, the Russian-speakers emphasise that integration is a two-way road, and advocate the need to ensure their effective participation in decision-making, and recognition of and respect to their distinct identity – in particular, by adapting the system of state government to the multicultural and multilingual nature of the Latvia’s society. In other words, the questions is whether the respect to gay video chat cultural diversity and full implementation of minority rights is a part of the integration concept or not. Thus, the statement quoted above is somewhat misleading – it would be better to stress the differences in approaches to the integration concept.

9. Para. 33 and footnote 5 [See new part 56 and you can footnote 8]: the footnote is very essential, indeed. However, the real picture is even more salient. It is worth mentioning that the pre-election programme of the Latvian People’s Front (LPF) in 1990 elections (when, for the last time, all residents were allowed to vote) contained a provision which for any practical reason could not be understood otherwise than “the zero option” (i.e. citizenship for everybody). This was one of the reasons why many Russian-speakers voted for the LPF then, thus ensuring its constitutional majority and the restoration of independence by parliamentary way. Thus, the non-citizens believe, and not without good reasons, that the legislators elected by them simply deprived their own electors of political rights, meanwhile keeping their mandates. Under these circumstances, the word “misunderstanding” hardly reflects the reality, and it is simply not true that “such sentiments are …without foundation”. As one of the LPF leaders, A. We chose deception” (Latvia – whose homeland? Report about the conference organized by the Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Riga: Goete Institute, 1994, in Latvian).

10. Para. 34 [See new sentences 53 and you can 54]: 42% is the figure for those ethnic Russians who were registered as citizens since they could trace their roots back to the citizens of the pre-war Latvia, not the number of those arrived after WW2.

The fresh figure 6000 into the Russian-talking relationships seems heavily overestimated, always 2 right up until 4 a huge selection of them officially registered (and some dozens very working) are mentioned

11. Para. 35 [See new section 60]: “Everyone agreed that the cultural rights of the minorities were respected. The NGOs also agreed that legislation complied with the minimum recommendations made by international organisations (the OSCE and the Council of Europe)”.

Panteleevs, informed inside 1994: “We had a choice – both so you can hack [the fresh Russian-speakers], or even take

The fresh new declaration tunes a while uncommon – what is actually required because the “cultural rights”? ‘s the right to degree for the mother tongue, and/or straight to fool around with fraction language in advance of public government included? And you can just what are these “minimal pointers”? Including, one another OSCE additionally the Council from Europe for many years recommended so you’re able to grant the brand new voting rights at municipal elections for low-citizens, and this refers to certainly maybe not used.

Off particular NGO representatives which participated in the latest group meetings that have the rapporteur, We heard very different version of whatever they said. I am frightened that section might possibly be contested in Latvia to your strictly informative basis, which means that trustworthiness of one’s entire declaration will be requested.